No on 8 ads started on KOIT 96.5 FM this afternoon - but 'No on 8' has not yet purchased time on KDFC 102.1.
Page Summary
altf4ljdrama.livejournal.com - Research?
low-fat-muffin.livejournal.com - Re: Research?
audrabaudra.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ursusarctos.livejournal.com - (no subject)
altf4ljdrama.livejournal.com - Re: Research?
joebehrsandiego.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-fat-muffin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
abqdan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
low-fat-muffin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
althrman.livejournal.com - Hug and a rub......
low-fat-muffin.livejournal.com - Re: Hug and a rub......
airporter.livejournal.com - (no subject)
surewood31.livejournal.com - (no subject)
surewood31.livejournal.com - (no subject)
airporter.livejournal.com - (no subject)
surewood31.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Modular by
- Theme: Starry Night by
- Resources: skylark_photos
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Research?
Date: 2008-10-21 02:12 am (UTC)At least KOIT is supposed to reach a lot of people! I wonder if things would've been different had my company still owned them.
Re: Research?
Date: 2008-10-21 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-21 03:09 am (UTC)We're facing, as a nation, the most important political season of our lives -- we may never have another chance to turn the tide if things don't progress beyond the dominant worldview in the White House right now.
To attack you, Bob, for what the station is doing is unthinkable. I'm grateful to have "inside information" on the way advertising issues are decided -- and mandated, so thank you for taking time to speak to all of us about this.
Right now, it's time to dig down and give money. Donate to some political cause or person or party in which you believe. Get your credit card and find a Website NOW. Obama has been able to counter McCain's negative ads at a something like two-to-one ratio in certain markets because of his $250 million fundraising month in September. This ALL comes down to advertising, friends -- we live in the most media-saturated country there is, and if we don't take control of the message and the airwaves, then THEY will.
And they have, as Bob has told.
If we don't hang together right now, at this moment, then we shall surely hang separately for a long time to come. They'll see to it. So stop them. Do something, anything, donate anything, however much or little you can afford, and take a stand.
(I've been feeling this in relation to the situation you're facing at work for days now -- thanks for giving me the place to post it.)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-21 03:53 am (UTC)In honor of the flack you've caught on this I just ponied up again for "No on 8".
Your aggravation hasn't been without a tiny bit of good coming from it.
*IF* you were working for a station that solicited and promoted "Yes on 8" ads it would be one thing. To whack you because of policies that would be in effect anywhere you worked in the field is another.
From reading your LJ for a few years, I think accusing you of being a Closeted Log Cabin GOPer is an indication that some people either don't read or retain much. (btw, the idea of a CLCGOPer makes my head spin from the irony fumes).
Re: Research?
Date: 2008-10-21 05:49 am (UTC)On a more serious note, I am sorry to hear they cut back air staff (nights across all 3?) and assistants. I got my job as a result of the swap. The previous company didn't believe in the necessity of office personnel.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-21 06:42 am (UTC)Robert is a nicer (and probably more rational ;)) man than I. If this had been done to me, the next day's LJ post would have included every f*cker's full name, email address, LJ handle and the text of their message to me.
Shame? Maybe. But people who behave like this, don't value tact, critical thinking and kindness. The only way to get their attention is to call them on their sh*t in public.
They still might not grow up ... but might think twice the next time.
Robert ... out of curiousity what % (ballpark) of your "friends" are SF/Bay Area residents?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-21 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-21 02:21 pm (UTC)We have an army of fighters (think Stonewall Queers, the NY response to the AIDs emergency, the volunteers working to defeat Prop 8, and the many others working for action committees and political campaigns) who are willing to put themselves out there to improve things for our community, and then we have the whiners. I'm sorry you became a victim of the whiners.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-21 02:54 pm (UTC)Hug and a rub......
Date: 2008-10-21 04:55 pm (UTC)DB
Re: Hug and a rub......
Date: 2008-10-21 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-21 08:00 pm (UTC)My understanding at this point: your company has no choice but to air the ads by law, with no regard to falacious content. The company's options are effectively limited to running disclaimer statements before and/or after each "Yes on 8" ad. It can't refuse them legally, and it's unclear that the company could afford to forgo the revenue by allowing both sides free advertising (or if that would even be legal.)
Your presentation of the facts surrounding the political advertising laws is appreciated, as is your overall positive presentation in the face of what can only feel like a wholly unjustified betrayal.
I'll hope it lets up on you soon.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 12:40 am (UTC)