I will respectfully point out that a majority of you have probably never heard of Congresswoman Virginia Fox (R. - North Carolina) until today - so using words like cunt and bitch to describe someone you've heard talk for 50 seconds is unwarranted. In fact - I'd go as far as to say talking about someone like that irregardless is inappropriate; even more so in a public forum like Facebook or here on Livejournal.
These words are sexist and devaluing to any women who might reading, who might want to be part of the discussion. I have many women on my friends list both here and on Facebook, and with that - I am always very careful with my language. It is simply not an intelligent response to start screaming Cbombs with explanation marks over a clearly inappropriate speech in the House of Representatives.
How would we react if someone used those words describing Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi or Patty Murray or Maria Cantwell or Hillary Clinton or any other female progressive?
I'll tell you how you might react - you'd dismiss someone using those words as incapable of any other response; and quickly tune them out.
We wouldn't want to be called faggot or some other negative word - so why do we say it's so easy and okay to use this kind of negative language on the congresswoman.
Was Congresswoman Fox disrespectful and perhaps ignorant? ABSOLUTELY!
Does she deserve the same sort of thing in return? No.
Lets try and keep our discussion about her words. We can spend time discussing the appropriateness of her speech on the floor of the House of Representatives without resorting to words that make us lesser for using them.
All of us should be smart enough to not break out into a curse-word laiden inappropriate speech-fest. But sometimes in the type-what-I-feel Twitter world - - - we just vent red hot magma that we'd never use otherwise.
Thank you.
These words are sexist and devaluing to any women who might reading, who might want to be part of the discussion. I have many women on my friends list both here and on Facebook, and with that - I am always very careful with my language. It is simply not an intelligent response to start screaming Cbombs with explanation marks over a clearly inappropriate speech in the House of Representatives.
How would we react if someone used those words describing Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi or Patty Murray or Maria Cantwell or Hillary Clinton or any other female progressive?
I'll tell you how you might react - you'd dismiss someone using those words as incapable of any other response; and quickly tune them out.
We wouldn't want to be called faggot or some other negative word - so why do we say it's so easy and okay to use this kind of negative language on the congresswoman.
Was Congresswoman Fox disrespectful and perhaps ignorant? ABSOLUTELY!
Does she deserve the same sort of thing in return? No.
Lets try and keep our discussion about her words. We can spend time discussing the appropriateness of her speech on the floor of the House of Representatives without resorting to words that make us lesser for using them.
All of us should be smart enough to not break out into a curse-word laiden inappropriate speech-fest. But sometimes in the type-what-I-feel Twitter world - - - we just vent red hot magma that we'd never use otherwise.
Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:17 am (UTC)Forgive me...
Date: 2009-04-30 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:27 am (UTC)To a certain extent, I'm a bit of a believer in (i) you reap what you sow, and (ii) (s)he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.
However I'd save it until I saw her on fire by the side of the road.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:05 am (UTC)I'm curious why you chose to put the word "perhaps" in that sentence. I had to go find the clip of this person to see what you were talking about. So she says that Matthew Shepard's murder wasn't a hate crime, had nothing to do with his sexuality? It was just a robbery gone wrong? Perhaps Fred Phelps is ignorant, maybe if we treat him with respect, listen to where he's coming from and understand his point, but try to educate him with the facts, maybe he will come around? Would you say that Bishop Richard Williamson's Holocaust denial statements and beliefs are "perhaps" wrong? At what point will you acknowledge that these people's disrespect and venom, their wanting to re-write history discount our rights, our humanity and our dignity? Their attitudes and their "my was is the only way" attitude are worse than any words I can use to describe them.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:23 am (UTC)You make it sound like I'm in agreement with her.
I'm just saying take task with her words - her actions - her ignorance. If the only response we can come up with is "fucking cunt" - then we lose.
I'm not suggesting that what she said was anything short of abhorrent. But deciding that the only thing we want to say in response to a congresswoman is from the get go - sexist and disrespectful than we are no better. I am saying the dialogue has to be above that - even if they are not.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:48 am (UTC)I know you don't just sit on your hands politically - but I worry that many of our community do just that.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 04:49 am (UTC)http://low-fat-muffin.livejournal.com/1090966.html
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:29 am (UTC)What I was responding to was the posts on Facebook and LJ that had the embedded video and "fucking bitch" or "cunt" -- and nothing else to say.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:58 am (UTC)One night in late October,
When I was far from sober,
Returning with my load with manly pride,
My feet began to stutter,
So I lay down in the gutter,
And a pig came near and lay down by my side;
A lady passing by was heard to say:
"You can tell a man who boozes,
By the company he chooses,"
And the pig got up and slowly walked away.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:32 am (UTC)and the C word is never appropriate
BUT...if everyone who uses the word "bitch" is being disrespectful to women...then probably 99 percent of the gay community is frequently guity of disrespect
The truth is ...the words bitch ...and bitchy...have largey lost their connection to just the one sex...and usually just mean malicious, spiteful, domineering, intrusive, hateful and unpleasant
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:36 am (UTC)Language is tricky - it constantly evolves. When I was a kid - bitch was an extremely inappropriate word.
I am apalled at Rep. Foxx's behavior - but using the Cword helps nobody. It just takes away any effective argument power away. It's just not right.
Thanks for replying....
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 01:35 am (UTC)Seriously though, the "C" word is inappropriate at any time.
HUGS!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:06 am (UTC)as
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 04:53 am (UTC)but my more immediate post that you are commenting on was about using words like cunt or bitch or other sexist inappropriate language out in the open on forums like Facebook or LJ without any thought to how it is perceived. It was less about Rep. Foxx - and more about using language that is sexist and degrading in public forums.
The C-Bomb is never used without an intent to harm. and I don't know a single woman in my life that doesn't simply respond with disgust when men around them throw the word around like "asshole" or "scumbag" because for them it has no damage factor. It's really easy for white guys to say cunt over and over and really casually - but I'm suggesting we think about how our female friends and fellow LJers or Facebook'ers view it and that it makes more of a statement about the person saying it - than about the person it's targeting, even if the target is a neoconservative windbag.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 11:53 am (UTC)