The new STAR TREK movie
Nov. 17th, 2008 04:34 pmAs my brother will tell you - it takes A LOT to get me excited about a movie. but - I spent my lunch hour today - downloading and then dissecting the new trailer for "STAR TREK" coming out May 9th. It looks like they are amping up the action a great deal. It is very smart of them to cast young actors that have been hits with their generation - because it'll draw an entirely new group as well as the hardcore lifelong trekkers. It looks to be the core story of Kirk and Spock meeting - with some character development in new ways for the other main crew. One of the stills I cut was Sulu in a sword fight with someone. Now - we all know trailers - but it looks to me like Uhura and Kirk are romantically involved. I think JJ Abrams is going to rock this story super hard. I'm so excited!!!!!












Here's a link to the new trailer site - the trailer is really worth waiting and watching in HD,
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/index.html
Here's a link to the new trailer site - the trailer is really worth waiting and watching in HD,
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/index.html
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 01:48 am (UTC)The uniforms seem to be made out of long johns...or j-cloths...or a certain brand of paper towels.
I thought Kirk and Spock met at an ice cream social?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 01:57 am (UTC)Edit: Just watched the HD version of the trailer (had already seen very low-res pirated versions posted to YouTube). OMFG.
*squee!!*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:10 am (UTC)I saw the Pirated trailer on YouTube 2 days ago and just about wet my pants. And to be honest, I'm not even a HUGE Star Trek fan! (Although I HAVE seen all the movies!)
:-)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 04:21 am (UTC)THEY HAVE IT IN EVERY SHAPE OR SIZE.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:20 am (UTC)From an "actors-in-real-life" perspective, though the Kirk/Spock one would be more accurate. ;>)
Most importantly, I agree wholeheartedly that this film will be a huge treat!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 04:27 am (UTC)here; here; and here....
Sad, isn't it? ;-)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 05:26 am (UTC)1) Why is the bridge so BRIGHT? I'm afraid someone's going to suffer retinal burns. Every still I've seen of the bridge shows flares; a sure sign of over-lighting.
2) How are they going to explain introducing Romulans so early in the history of Star Trek? Those of us who remember the series knows that no one had seen a Romulan prior to Kirk's captaincy. However, they also introduced Ferengi and bony-browed Klingons to the "Enterprise" series, so who knows?
Depending on how it's handled this film could be very good or very bad. "Superman Returns" didn't do well, because they tweeked the details just a bit too much (Same with X-men 3). I want this to succeed.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 08:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:01 pm (UTC)ST canon stated long ago that most of the fleet (though not the original Enterprise, at least not explicitly) was built at the Utopia Planitia orbital shipyards above Mars. I had little hope that the typical egocentric Hollywood types would respect established storylines, of course.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-18 03:13 pm (UTC)